Friday, December 21, 2007
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Monday, December 3, 2007
Monday, November 26, 2007
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Science news
If science is your racket, you'll love this story from London's Daily Telegraph, entitled Surfer dude stuns physicists with theory of everything.
First sentence of the article:
Trivia and joke oriented that I am I only bring it up to quote some weisenheimer's post from my extremist discussion forum where the link to the article was posted:
The transcript of Lisi explaining the E8 diagram to another physicist,
Lisi: Dude, look.
Physicist: Dude?
Lisi: Dude, yeah.
Physicist: Dude, no way!
Lisi: Dude, way!
Physicist: Duuude...
First sentence of the article:
An impoverished surfer has drawn up a new theory of the universe, seen by some as the Holy Grail of physics, which as received rave reviews from scientists.
Trivia and joke oriented that I am I only bring it up to quote some weisenheimer's post from my extremist discussion forum where the link to the article was posted:
The transcript of Lisi explaining the E8 diagram to another physicist,
Lisi: Dude, look.
Physicist: Dude?
Lisi: Dude, yeah.
Physicist: Dude, no way!
Lisi: Dude, way!
Physicist: Duuude...
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
The Next President of the United States!
I want you to realize the enormity and seriousness of the following. As you read this post, there are almost two dozen men and one woman traveling across the United States, appearing before audiences in small and large arenas, making speeches, shaking hands, hugging babies, and being introduced over loudspeakers, every single one of the two dozen as:

"Ladies and Gentlemen, the Next President of the United States"

What am I to make of this?
Friday, November 2, 2007
Beverage News Flash Alert
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Monday, October 15, 2007
Monday, October 1, 2007
The answer at last!
Two conspiracy theorists die and go to heaven.
Upon meeting God, one asks: "Tell us the truth, who really killed JFK?"
God replies: "It's really very simple boys. Oswald acting alone killed Kennedy, and Jack Ruby acting alone killed Oswald."
One theorist turns to the other saying, "The conspiracy is deeper than I first thought."
Monday, September 24, 2007
Sunday, September 16, 2007
H2O Wagon

On the wagon, off the wagon, which is it? I had to look it up. 'on the wagon' means you quit drinking alcohol, 'off the wagon' means you're back in action. Etymology? The expression dates back to the early 1900s, and it referred to horse driven water wagons. That dude in the colorized picture above is Jack London himself, five days before his death on November 17, 1916. Here's a sheet music cover for a song from 1903 composed and performed by one Paul West.

Sunday, September 9, 2007
Monday, August 27, 2007
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Saturday, August 4, 2007
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Thailand Rocks (Postcard Home)
Monday, July 9, 2007
Hot Earth!
Here's a song my Internet pun pal Charles Henrickson wrote to commemorate the worldwide Live Earth concerts. Sing it to the tune of the Doors' Riders on the Storm.
WHY IT'S GETTING WARMWhy it's getting warm
Why it's getting warm
Is it hotter than the norm
Or just turning back to form
Gore would sound the warning horn
And make cars that run on corn
Why it's getting warmThere's an inconsistent flaw
In his scientific law
There's not one single cause
For why an iceberg thaws
The conclusion that he draws
Is giving us guffaws
An inconsistent flawGore, you incoherent goof
Gore, you incoherent goof
It doesn't take a sleuth
To see your lack of proof
Here's an inconvenient truth
It's still freezing in Duluth
You incoherent goofWhy it's getting warm
Why it's getting warm
Is it hotter than the norm
Or just turning back to form
Gore would sound the warning horn
And make cars that run on corn
Why it's getting warm
Why it's getting warm
Why it's getting warm . . .
Friday, June 29, 2007
Bad sex
I think you'll enjoy this precious find.
Literary Review Magazine is a British literary monthly, which has established a yearly Bad Sex in Fiction Award, that it gives out not to literature commonly recognized as 'pornographic', but to literature, which is, for good reasons or worse, not considered pornographic. Some well known authors have won the award, the purpose of which, we are told, is to discourage crude depictions of intimate encounters. Oh, OK, another good cause to take up while we're not busy fighting Global Warming. The BBC article linked here has more juicy details.
Having read some of the excerpts cited by the article, and the articles from previous years linked there as well, I conclude that the famous authors ought to spend some time here, clicking on the Next Blog button until, soon enough, they arrive at a blog containing personal confessions and descriptions of scenes that actually occurred, then copy the purple prose to the clipboard, and, what the hell, paste it into their major works (as their minor novels are invariably labeled.) After all, as Pablo Picasso himself observed, amateurs borrow, professionals steal!
Monday, June 25, 2007
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Like flowers

"They say women are like flowers. Maybe they’re right. Nice to look at, fun to smell, covered in complicated reproductive do-dads. But brother, get too close and you’ll also find out that they have thorns. And bees. And enough pollen to flood your sinus with a hot painful load of mucus that’ll take a jumbo economy size box of Claritin and a six pack of hankies to forget."
-- IowaHawk

Monday, June 18, 2007
Friday, June 8, 2007
Fluff
Dear Pillow,
Pillow Talk was of course a 1959 film starring Doris Day, who had a public reputation as an eternal virgin, and Rock Hudson, who had a Hollywood reputation as a poofter, before that reputation became public knowledge some twenty years later. What a pairing, huh? Would that make Doris Day a faghag? In any event, the film was directed by Michael Gordon who had previously directed Jose Ferrer in Cyrano De Bergerac (1951). The plot was a story of two neighbours who shared a telephone line and hated each other, before becoming involved romantically.
A light romantic comedy it was, like many others of the kind. Today, 48 years later, you can not say that they don't make them any more like they used to, because they do, and do, and do. During a long flight to Europe or from Europe a few years ago, I watched and didn't watch a then recent romantic comedy starring, as I recall, Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts. I watched it a minute at a time every ten minutes or so, while switching to and from a Lyle Lovett double album on the audio channel. And, amazingly, though not surprisingly, I didn't miss anything in the plot of the film! Now I suspect I wouldn't have missed anything of the plot by not watching the film at all. Boy meets girl, etc.
Pillow Talk was very successful at the time, and if they could, Hollywood hacks would remake it in a New York minute for the modern audience, starring some current heartthrobs, whoever they happen to be, but then, how to update the essential plot element of a shared telephone line? The dramatic change in our telephoning habits has had an equally dramatic, some might say disastrous, effect on the plot contents in films and in popular music as well. It's a serious sociological issue that we have neither time nor space to fully explore here, but be aware that you won't hear songs any more about having or not having a dime for a telephone call, or films about sharing a telephone line. So you're right, they don't make them any more like they used to! It's our loss. Pity.
Pillow Talk was of course a 1959 film starring Doris Day, who had a public reputation as an eternal virgin, and Rock Hudson, who had a Hollywood reputation as a poofter, before that reputation became public knowledge some twenty years later. What a pairing, huh? Would that make Doris Day a faghag? In any event, the film was directed by Michael Gordon who had previously directed Jose Ferrer in Cyrano De Bergerac (1951). The plot was a story of two neighbours who shared a telephone line and hated each other, before becoming involved romantically.
A light romantic comedy it was, like many others of the kind. Today, 48 years later, you can not say that they don't make them any more like they used to, because they do, and do, and do. During a long flight to Europe or from Europe a few years ago, I watched and didn't watch a then recent romantic comedy starring, as I recall, Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts. I watched it a minute at a time every ten minutes or so, while switching to and from a Lyle Lovett double album on the audio channel. And, amazingly, though not surprisingly, I didn't miss anything in the plot of the film! Now I suspect I wouldn't have missed anything of the plot by not watching the film at all. Boy meets girl, etc.
Pillow Talk was very successful at the time, and if they could, Hollywood hacks would remake it in a New York minute for the modern audience, starring some current heartthrobs, whoever they happen to be, but then, how to update the essential plot element of a shared telephone line? The dramatic change in our telephoning habits has had an equally dramatic, some might say disastrous, effect on the plot contents in films and in popular music as well. It's a serious sociological issue that we have neither time nor space to fully explore here, but be aware that you won't hear songs any more about having or not having a dime for a telephone call, or films about sharing a telephone line. So you're right, they don't make them any more like they used to! It's our loss. Pity.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Tears on my pillow
Now the pillow's inquiring.
What is this all about? Why another blog by you A.? To contribute even more graphomaniac warble to the industrial noise of the Internet? As an aimless exercise in phonographic writing? Phonography without photography? Who needs that?!
An honest answer in the age of widespread dishonesty. The blog was started as a lure, a bait, a tease, to gain something of some importance then, and in the end of little importance now and in the future. The bait must have been stale anyway, because it didn't succeed in luring the prey, but the blog, begun but devoid of content, stayed.
What to put in it, that is still the question, as its initial purpose was unknown and unknowable. Things that one would only tell or cry to one's pillow? Exhibitionism of the secretive kind? Sounds like a plan, enjoy!
What is this all about? Why another blog by you A.? To contribute even more graphomaniac warble to the industrial noise of the Internet? As an aimless exercise in phonographic writing? Phonography without photography? Who needs that?!
An honest answer in the age of widespread dishonesty. The blog was started as a lure, a bait, a tease, to gain something of some importance then, and in the end of little importance now and in the future. The bait must have been stale anyway, because it didn't succeed in luring the prey, but the blog, begun but devoid of content, stayed.
What to put in it, that is still the question, as its initial purpose was unknown and unknowable. Things that one would only tell or cry to one's pillow? Exhibitionism of the secretive kind? Sounds like a plan, enjoy!
Monday, June 4, 2007
Lit Porn
Hello Pillow,
Allow me to share a minor discovery. While clicking on the Next Blog button the other day, I chanced on an interesting blog among dozens and dozens of uninteresting ones.
It is a diary written by a female, about 30 years old, she says, who signs only her three letter initials, and who willingly serves as a "slave" to a somewhat mysterious male "Master". She describes their relationship in excrutiating detail, a sado-masochistic relationship, which she claims to enjoy immensely. The Master lives and works far away, she says, and they see each other every several weeks when he comes to visit, for sessions of sexual dominance and submission.
It appears to be an honest blog, with a good, but not an overwhelming, portion of it being erotic or pornographic, and quite explicit at that. (You'll have to locate it yourself. Or request the URL by personal e-mail.) But the reason it is of note is the quality of writing, yes, believe it, which makes one suspicious it may be another one of literary hoaxes the likes of which we have seen lately. The writer is very articulate describing her thinking, her desires, her dreams and hopes, and her relationship with the Master, who, she reports, encouraged, or ordered her to start writing this blog. It makes for fascinating reading without being vulgar pornography.
Now, admittedly, I'm not the best judge of these things, as I haven't read Marquis de Sade, Henry Miller or O, who penned that classic masterpiece The Story of O, and my only reading experiences in this area have been via steamy erotic poetry sent to me by a woman friend in the past year, and a long ago visit to an adult book shop to verify an assertion made by Emmett Grogan in his memoir Ringolevio, stating that the main rule he and all writers of the literary genre had to follow when writing pornographic novels, that they sold to publishers for $200 apiece, which in the 1960s was like a million dollars or less today, was to have on every page an explicit sex scene, so that a browsing bookstore customer opening the book at random would always encounter exactly what he, and it was invariably a 'he', was looking for inside a work of this type. The assertion proved to be correct.
Allow me to share a minor discovery. While clicking on the Next Blog button the other day, I chanced on an interesting blog among dozens and dozens of uninteresting ones.
It is a diary written by a female, about 30 years old, she says, who signs only her three letter initials, and who willingly serves as a "slave" to a somewhat mysterious male "Master". She describes their relationship in excrutiating detail, a sado-masochistic relationship, which she claims to enjoy immensely. The Master lives and works far away, she says, and they see each other every several weeks when he comes to visit, for sessions of sexual dominance and submission.
It appears to be an honest blog, with a good, but not an overwhelming, portion of it being erotic or pornographic, and quite explicit at that. (You'll have to locate it yourself. Or request the URL by personal e-mail.) But the reason it is of note is the quality of writing, yes, believe it, which makes one suspicious it may be another one of literary hoaxes the likes of which we have seen lately. The writer is very articulate describing her thinking, her desires, her dreams and hopes, and her relationship with the Master, who, she reports, encouraged, or ordered her to start writing this blog. It makes for fascinating reading without being vulgar pornography.
Now, admittedly, I'm not the best judge of these things, as I haven't read Marquis de Sade, Henry Miller or O, who penned that classic masterpiece The Story of O, and my only reading experiences in this area have been via steamy erotic poetry sent to me by a woman friend in the past year, and a long ago visit to an adult book shop to verify an assertion made by Emmett Grogan in his memoir Ringolevio, stating that the main rule he and all writers of the literary genre had to follow when writing pornographic novels, that they sold to publishers for $200 apiece, which in the 1960s was like a million dollars or less today, was to have on every page an explicit sex scene, so that a browsing bookstore customer opening the book at random would always encounter exactly what he, and it was invariably a 'he', was looking for inside a work of this type. The assertion proved to be correct.
Friday, June 1, 2007
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




















